Garda Oracle

Ora and Peler forecast for Torbole

Torbole now · Meteotrentino T0193

3.5 kt · E (68°)
Gusts 6.0 kt
Updated 23:45 local time

Today Sun 4 Oct

Forecast data is missing for this day.

Tomorrow Mon 5 Oct

Peler · Tomorrow

5 October 2026 · early · approx. 04:00–09:00 · NO GO · 36% probability

These three weather factors have the strongest influence on today’s forecast compared with an average day in the season.

Bolzano−Verona pressure gradient (overnight)
0.8 hPa
Works against Peler

The overnight Bolzano−Verona pressure difference is the strongest pressure driver in the Peler model: it indicates whether air is being pushed south along the lake.

Overnight humidity
64.3 %
Works against Peler

Overnight humidity describes the air mass and indicates whether cloud or fog may form and alter Peler’s development.

Innsbruck−Verona pressure gradient (overnight)
1.0 hPa
Supports Peler

The overnight Innsbruck−Verona gradient describes the broad pressure drive across the Alps while Peler is developing.

Show all other factors (6)
Wind at 100 m (overnight)
1.5 km/h
Supports Peler

Overnight wind at 100 metres shows whether the broad flow supports Peler, overrides it or mixes the lower atmosphere.

Innsbruck−Verona pressure difference (morning)
1.8 hPa
Works against Peler

The Innsbruck−Verona gradient describes the broad pressure distribution between the Alps and Po Valley. A very strong northerly gradient can suppress Ora; a favourable distribution lets it develop more freely.

Overnight cloud cover
92.6 %
Works against Peler

Cloud slows overnight cooling. A clear night supports the temperature and pressure differences from which Peler develops.

Evening and overnight rain
0.0 mm
Supports Peler

Evening or overnight rain affects cooling, changes the air mass and often disrupts Peler’s development.

Previous-afternoon solar radiation
610.0 W/m²
Supports Peler

Previous-afternoon sunshine affects how strongly the land and mountain slopes heated up and the conditions in which the overnight circulation begins.

Po Valley–Alps heating contrast
3.4 °C
Supports Peler

The temperature contrast between Verona and Innsbruck represents the different rates of heating in the Po Valley and Alpine region, and therefore the thermal drive.

Whether a factor raises or lowers the probability comes from the statistical model. This shows a statistical relationship, not proof of a single physical cause. All listed factors feed into the forecast; the three strongest are highlighted.

Ora · Tomorrow

5 October 2026 · midday · usually starts 10:40–12:20 · NO GO · 25% probability

These three weather factors have the strongest influence on today’s forecast compared with an average day in the season.

Morning cloud cover
94.1 %
Works against Ora

Morning cloud reduces solar radiation and therefore the energy available for Ora’s thermal development.

Morning solar radiation
396.0 W/m²
Works against Ora

Strong morning sunshine heats slopes and valleys. This builds the pressure difference that draws Ora towards the northern end of the lake.

Bolzano−Verona pressure difference (morning)
1.1 hPa
Supports Ora

The pressure gradient between Bolzano and Verona represents the pressure distribution between the Alps and Po Valley. This affects the thermal draw through the Sarca Valley.

Show all other factors (9)
Daytime precipitation
0.0 mm
Supports Ora

Rain and showers limit heating and can interrupt the local circulation. Daytime precipitation therefore usually works against Ora.

South–north wind component at 100 m
2.8 km/h
Works against Ora

The south–north wind component shows whether the broad flow is aligned with Ora or works against it.

Innsbruck−Verona pressure difference (morning)
1.8 hPa
Works against Ora

The Innsbruck−Verona gradient describes the broad pressure distribution between the Alps and Po Valley. A very strong northerly gradient can suppress Ora; a favourable distribution lets it develop more freely.

Pressure-gradient trend (morning → midday)
-0.4 hPa
Works against Ora

This value shows how the Innsbruck−Verona pressure gradient changes from early morning to midday.

Morning humidity
69.8 %
Supports Ora

High humidity often accompanies weaker heating, haze or cloud. In drier air, the thermal circulation can usually develop more freely.

West–east wind component at 100 m
3.3 km/h
Works against Ora

The west–east component of the wind at 100 metres lets the model assess the direction of the broad flow separately from its overall speed.

Daily maximum temperature
22.9 °C
Works against Ora

The expected maximum temperature in Torbole represents the amount of daytime heating and the thermal energy available.

Wind at 100 m (midday)
4.3 km/h
Supports Ora

Wind at 100 metres represents the broad flow over the lake. Depending on its direction, it can support or override the local wind system.

Po Valley–Alps heating contrast
3.4 °C
Supports Ora

The temperature contrast between Verona and Innsbruck represents the different rates of heating in the Po Valley and Alpine region, and therefore the thermal drive.

Whether a factor raises or lowers the probability comes from the statistical model. This shows a statistical relationship, not proof of a single physical cause. All listed factors feed into the forecast; the three strongest are highlighted.

Day after tomorrow Tue 6 Oct

Peler · Day after tomorrow

6 October 2026 · early · approx. 04:00–09:00 · GO · 82% probability

These three weather factors have the strongest influence on today’s forecast compared with an average day in the season.

Bolzano−Verona pressure gradient (overnight)
1.2 hPa
Works against Peler

The overnight Bolzano−Verona pressure difference is the strongest pressure driver in the Peler model: it indicates whether air is being pushed south along the lake.

Overnight humidity
74.7 %
Works against Peler

Overnight humidity describes the air mass and indicates whether cloud or fog may form and alter Peler’s development.

Innsbruck−Verona pressure gradient (overnight)
1.8 hPa
Supports Peler

The overnight Innsbruck−Verona gradient describes the broad pressure drive across the Alps while Peler is developing.

Show all other factors (6)
Wind at 100 m (overnight)
2.1 km/h
Supports Peler

Overnight wind at 100 metres shows whether the broad flow supports Peler, overrides it or mixes the lower atmosphere.

Innsbruck−Verona pressure difference (morning)
1.7 hPa
Works against Peler

The Innsbruck−Verona gradient describes the broad pressure distribution between the Alps and Po Valley. A very strong northerly gradient can suppress Ora; a favourable distribution lets it develop more freely.

Overnight cloud cover
29.9 %
Supports Peler

Cloud slows overnight cooling. A clear night supports the temperature and pressure differences from which Peler develops.

Previous-afternoon solar radiation
430.0 W/m²
Supports Peler

Previous-afternoon sunshine affects how strongly the land and mountain slopes heated up and the conditions in which the overnight circulation begins.

Po Valley–Alps heating contrast
1.2 °C
Supports Peler

The temperature contrast between Verona and Innsbruck represents the different rates of heating in the Po Valley and Alpine region, and therefore the thermal drive.

Evening and overnight rain
0.0 mm
Supports Peler

Evening or overnight rain affects cooling, changes the air mass and often disrupts Peler’s development.

Whether a factor raises or lowers the probability comes from the statistical model. This shows a statistical relationship, not proof of a single physical cause. All listed factors feed into the forecast; the three strongest are highlighted.

Ora · Day after tomorrow

6 October 2026 · midday · usually starts 10:40–12:20 · GO · 75% probability

These three weather factors have the strongest influence on today’s forecast compared with an average day in the season.

South–north wind component at 100 m
13.1 km/h
Supports Ora

The south–north wind component shows whether the broad flow is aligned with Ora or works against it.

Bolzano−Verona pressure difference (morning)
1.3 hPa
Supports Ora

The pressure gradient between Bolzano and Verona represents the pressure distribution between the Alps and Po Valley. This affects the thermal draw through the Sarca Valley.

Morning solar radiation
462.0 W/m²
Works against Ora

Strong morning sunshine heats slopes and valleys. This builds the pressure difference that draws Ora towards the northern end of the lake.

Show all other factors (9)
Daytime precipitation
0.0 mm
Supports Ora

Rain and showers limit heating and can interrupt the local circulation. Daytime precipitation therefore usually works against Ora.

Innsbruck−Verona pressure difference (morning)
1.7 hPa
Works against Ora

The Innsbruck−Verona gradient describes the broad pressure distribution between the Alps and Po Valley. A very strong northerly gradient can suppress Ora; a favourable distribution lets it develop more freely.

Pressure-gradient trend (morning → midday)
-3.2 hPa
Supports Ora

This value shows how the Innsbruck−Verona pressure gradient changes from early morning to midday.

Morning cloud cover
66.7 %
Works against Ora

Morning cloud reduces solar radiation and therefore the energy available for Ora’s thermal development.

Morning humidity
73.8 %
Supports Ora

High humidity often accompanies weaker heating, haze or cloud. In drier air, the thermal circulation can usually develop more freely.

Wind at 100 m (midday)
13.3 km/h
Works against Ora

Wind at 100 metres represents the broad flow over the lake. Depending on its direction, it can support or override the local wind system.

Daily maximum temperature
22.4 °C
Works against Ora

The expected maximum temperature in Torbole represents the amount of daytime heating and the thermal energy available.

Po Valley–Alps heating contrast
1.2 °C
Supports Ora

The temperature contrast between Verona and Innsbruck represents the different rates of heating in the Po Valley and Alpine region, and therefore the thermal drive.

West–east wind component at 100 m
-2.5 km/h
Supports Ora

The west–east component of the wind at 100 metres lets the model assess the direction of the broad flow separately from its overall speed.

Whether a factor raises or lowers the probability comes from the statistical model. This shows a statistical relationship, not proof of a single physical cause. All listed factors feed into the forecast; the three strongest are highlighted.

How good is the model? · How does it work?